Legal Opinion

Bloxom v. Henneford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1938No. 26878. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Section 8, chapter 180, Laws of 1935, p. 716, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-8 [P. C. § 7030-68], provides that persons engaged in business as distributors of agricultural products — brokers in agricultural products or produce jobbers— shall pay, for the act or privilege of engaging in such business activity, a tax which

“. . . shall be equal, to the gross earning upon such sales multiplied by the rate of one-half of one per cent, the intent hereof being that tax measured by gross proceeds of sales shall be imposed only with respect to persons making the last of a succession of wholesale sales…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
  2. United States Gypsum Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Dain Manufacturing Co. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  4. Jackson v. City of Glenwood SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API