Legal Opinion

Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1950No. 30980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to obtain a refund of excise taxes paid to the tax commission of the state of Washington.

The company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling flour, cereals, and other grain products at Seattle, Washington. It is accordingly subject to the business and occupation tax imposed by title II of the state revenue act of 1935, as amended.

During the period in question, from January 1, 1944, to June 30, 1946, plaintiff made its business and occupation tax returns on the basis of the value of the products manufactured as measured by the total purchase price…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Longview Co. v. LynnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Spokane County Health District v. BrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cole v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Tax Commission v. Miami Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API