Legal Opinion
Crowley v. Renico
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2003No. Nos. 02-2224, 02-2290PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Michael Crowley appeals a district court judgment that denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
The Michigan Parole Board denied Crowley parole in March 2000, and reaffirmed its decision upon reconsideration in April 2000. Crowley sought leave to file his federal habeas corpus petition in April 2001, and was granted leave to file his petition in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Et Al., Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Alastair P. Sims v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Juarez v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elder v. BerghuisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Crowley v. Renico, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004