Legal Opinion
Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 5, 2001No. 99-4187PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine what effect a motion for a delayed appeal, filed under the Ohio Supreme Court’s Rules of Practice, has on the one-year statute of limitations contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), which governs the filing of a federal habeas action.
The petitioner, Parrish Searcy, is an Ohio state prisoner who was convicted of robbery in 1994. He unsuccessfully appealed his conviction to the Ohio Court of Appeals but never filed a timely application for review in the Ohio Supreme Court, instead pursuing a motion for new trial and subsequent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Dennis Isham v. Michael Randle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Larry Lyons v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Johnny Cowherd v. George Million, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Judah Hargrove v. Anthony J. BriganoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ralph Miller v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Alfred L. Dicenzi v. Norman Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.