People v. Correa
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Delays between indictment and the arraignment, like other court congestion, do not prevent the People from being ready for trial. Such delays are, therefore, not excludable under CPL 30.30 (see, People v Brothers, 50 NY2d 413, 417; see also, People v Toro, 151 AD2d 142, lv dismissed 75 NY2d 818; accord, People v Rhee, 111 AD2d 655; People v O’Neal, 99 AD2d 844).
The People’s contention that they are legally blocked from announcing their readiness for trial prior to arraignment because defendant might not yet…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. Ki RheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. O'NealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by78 opinions
- People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.