Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Lunn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON Appeal from the Circuit Court.of Davidson County to tlie Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — II. M. Musks, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

On November 9,-1911, one Notman sold to defendant three hundred and thirty-three “fuel savers,” patented articles. At the same time, as “territorial agent” of his company, the owner of the patent, he arranged to let defendant have an exclusive right to sell these articles and such others as he might order, in the State of Tennessee, a writing being delivered at the time, duly signed by the owner of the patent, and delivered to defendant. In consideration of the articles purchased and the exclusive right to sell in Tennessee, defendant executed to Notman his note for $495, due at a future…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Allen v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Pinney v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Snoddy v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. John Woods & Sons v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kitts v. KittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Griswold v. Dixie Foundry Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1948
  3. Frazier v. LaffertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Phillips v. Cottage Grove Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  5. Windt v. LindyTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API