John Woods & Sons v. Carl
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. The facts , are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham
This action was brought in the proper court of the State of Arkansas by the plaintiffs in error to recover the amount of a promissory note, which was given by the defendant in error on the sale to him of a patented machine and of the right to the- patent in the State of Arkansas. Before the maturity of the note it was indorsed by the payee and transferred to plaintiffs in error. The note was not executed as provided for by the statute of that State relating to the sale of rights under a patent. Act of April 23, 1891, Kirby’s Dig., sec. 513. The section reads as follows:
“Sec. 513. Any vendor…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Long v. RockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- Benton v. SikytaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.