Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Dixie Foundry Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 20, 1948No. Civil Action No. 1212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DARR, District Judge.

The defendant has a motion (1) to require plaintiff to declare whether he intends his suit to be one upon contract or ■one upon tort, and (2) to dismiss by virtue of certain Tennessee statutes.

The second ground of the motion will be first considered.

The plaintiff, as an inventor, entered into a contract with the defendant, a manufacturer, whereby the defendant would manufacture certain patented articles upon royalty basis. On the charge that the defendant has failed to comply with the contract, the plaintiff claims damages.

Jurisdiction arises by virtue of diversity of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Cohn v. LunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert C. Switzer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph L. Switzer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Senter v. BF Goodrich CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
  3. Virginia Surety Co. v. Knoxville Transit Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  4. Walla v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API