Legal Opinion

Martin v. Sixty-Third & Halsted State Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 27, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

At the conclusion of all the evidence in the trial of an action seeking damages for fraud and deceit defendants moved for a directed verdict in their favor; the court, acting under section 68 of the Civil Practice Act, reserved its ruling and permitted the case to go to the jury; a verdict was returned against these two defendants for $10,800; the court then entered its judgment against plaintiff, notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff appeals to this court.

Plaintiff’s claim is based upon the sale to him by defendants of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kehl v. AbramIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Farmer v. Alton Building & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Capelle v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  4. McNeill v. Harrison & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  5. Foster v. OberreichIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  2. Sixty-Third & Halsted State Savings Bank v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Goodrich v. SpragueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. GillDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API