Legal Opinion

Greensboro Life Insurance v. Knight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Gime, J., at Spring Term, 1912, of NORTHAMPTON. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clakk:, 0. J.

Tbis was an action begun before a justice of tbe peace for tbe recovery on a note of $133.38 for tbe first premium on an insurance policy for $2,000. Tbe defendant refused to pay tbe note, upon tbe ground tbat tbe execution of tbe note bad been secured by false and fraudulent representations of tbe plaintiff made at tbe time tbe note was executed and delivered. Tbe whole case turned upon tbat point and tbe jury found tbe facts witb tbe defendant.. Upon tbis proposition, there was testimony on both sides, and being an issue of fact, it is not necessary to state tbe evidence upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Brink v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Gray v. . CartwrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Machine Co. v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Winborne Guano Co. v. Plymouth Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API