Legal Opinion

Winborne Guano Co. v. Plymouth Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Garter, J., at September' Term, 1914, of ChowaN.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of contract in refusing to .take certain‘fertilizers which had been sold to defendant. -The latter agreed with plaintiff, on 5 January, 1913, to buy from him “100 bags or more” of different kinds of fertilizers, named in the contract, at prices therein fixed, to be delivered “f. o. b. cars at Norfolk, Ya., freight to be added. Payable 1 May, 1913, to be covered by note or cash within thirty days from time of shipment,” and to be shipped, as wanted, to 1 May, 1913, upon signed orders from defendant. According to the terms of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Greensboro Life Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Elliott v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Mizzell v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Wacksmuth v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Lamb v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Michaux v. Paul Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Dalrymple v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API