People v. Franzen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Defendant Yvette Renee Franzen was found guilty by a jury of selling methamphetamine. On appeal she contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of an incriminating statement she made to a police officer. She also contends that the court should have sustained her hearsay objection to evidence that a Web site identified her as the owner of a cell phone used in the sale transaction. We conclude that the trial court could properly find that defendant’s statement was not the product of interrogation, but that the court erred by admitting the evidence from the Web…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. StampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. AndreasenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Mooring, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- (HC) Jasso v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.