Legal Opinion

People v. Andreasen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 2013No. D060039PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

Eric Russell Andreasen appeals from a judgment convicting him of first degree murder, with a special circumstance finding of murder during the commission of attempted robbery. At trial, defendant disputed that he was engaged in a robbery at the time of the killing, and also raised a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.

On appeal, defendant argues the guilt phase judgment must be reversed because (1) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting prior misconduct *74evidence, (2) there was insufficient evidence of attempted robbery to support the special circumstance…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ShamblinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. Villa-GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. CannataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API