Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This patent case comes before the Court on defendant U.S. Home Detention Systems and Equipment Inc.’s (“U.S. Home”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction [Docket No. 163]. The Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction is proper due to the existence of a federal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, in conjunction with the section of the U.S.Code which provides district courts jurisdiction over patent cases, 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Alcohol Monitoring…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. WycoffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Anderson v. Biegler GmbHDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Elk Energy Holdings, LLC v. Lippelmann Partners LLC, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Energetiq Technology, Inc. v. ASML Netherlands B.V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.