Legal Opinion

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 14, 2021No. 1:06-cv-00605Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT) Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EFFERVESCENT, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT U.S.A. DAWGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RONALD SNYDER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment of Lanham Act Claim [Docket No. 909] filed by Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”) and the Individual Defendants;1 (2) the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API