Elk Energy Holdings, LLC v. Lippelmann Partners LLC, et al.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ELK ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 22-1057-DDC-BGS ) LIPPELMANN PARTNERS LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE Before the Court is a Motion to Intervene filed by pro se Movant, Sujit Gaikwad (hereinafter “Movant”). (Doc. 120.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. I. Factual Background. A. Lawsuit Filed and Funds Interplead. Plaintiff Elk Energy Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff”) operates the Lippelmann Oil and Gas Lease (“the lease”). Defendant Lippelmann Partners…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.