Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Rahr Malting Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1989No. C3-88-2150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Justice.
We review on certiorari an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals vacating an earlier award based upon a settlement. Concluding that further evidence is necessary for ascertaining the existence of good cause, we reverse and remand.
I
On February 3, 1981, Raymond Stewart sustained a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Rahr Malting Company. The employer and its workers’ compensation insurer accepted liability and paid certain workers’ compensation benefits, including compensation for a 5% permanent partial disability. On February…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mattson v. AbateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Turner v. Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Alexander v. Kenneth R. LaLonde EnterprisesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Krebsbach v. Lake Lillian Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Maurer v. Braun's Locker PlantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franke v. Fabcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hudson v. Trillium StaffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Monson v. White Bear MitsubishiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Steinhaus v. ClementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992