Legal Opinion

Smith v. City Council of Charleston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 2, 1941No. 15336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Baker.

The basis of this action is a claim for salary alleged to be due respondent by appellant. Respondent had been the treasurer of the City of Charleston continuously since October 14, 1919, to the date of this controversy. As a result of certain matters arising in connection with the conduct of the office and alleged shortages, the respondent applied for and obtained leave of absence from the details of the office in order to devote his entire time to the investigation of and assist in the checking of an audit report made for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. McDowell v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. Goree v. County SupervisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Atherton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gaskin v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Bradford v. Byrnes, GovernorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API