Legal Opinion
Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment Security
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 11, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The facts are not in dispute. The claimants for unemployment benefits under G. L. c. 151A, inserted by St. 1941, c. 685, § 1, as amended, are three mar*370ried women formerly employed by Raytheon Company (Raytheon) who left their employment “for the purpose of joining and living with [their] husband[s] located outside this Comm onwealth. ’ ’1 Employment continued to be available to them with Raytheon. Each of the three claimants sought work in the State to which she had removed and, failing to find work, each has applied for unemployment benefits.
The director of the division of employment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Teicher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Lamont v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Amoco Oil Co. v. DicksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Director of the Division of Employment Security v. FingermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Worcester Telegram Publishing Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Conlon v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.