Legal Opinion

Emergency Ambulance Services v. Pritchard

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 31, 2016No. CV-16-103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRita W. Gruber, Judge

h Emergency Ambulance Services brings this appeal from the decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) that awarded a forty percent permanent impairment rating to David Pritchard, a paramedic supervisor for appellant. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the award, arguing that the Commission ignored pertinent case law and improperly relied on an impairment rating that was based on subjective complaints and testing. We affirm.

An injured employee is entitled to compensation for the permanent functional or anatomical loss of use of the body…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Stone ContainerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Stephens Truck Lines v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Singleton v. City of Pine BluffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Pyle v. Woodfield, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Hernandez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bittle v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Arkansas Forestry Commission; And Arkansas Insurance Department, Public Employee Claims Division v. Thomas LindseyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  3. David Evans v. Firestone Building Products, Ltd., and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. v. YouseyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. v. YouseyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API