Legal Opinion

Bittle v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 29, 2017No. CV-17-175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Yirden, Judge

| Appellant Helen Bittle appeals from the decision., of the Arkansas .Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission), affirming and adopting the, administrative law judge’s (ALJ) opinion, finding that Bit-tie did not prove that she sustained com! pensable injuries to her .upper and lower back, right hip, and coccyx on April 6 and 12,2015, arising out of and, in .the course of her employment with appellee Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Wal-Mart). Bittle argues that there is no substantial evidence to support - the Commission’s decision. 1 We .affirm.

| ¡.I Compensable Injury

“Compensable injury”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. Kellogg, Brown & RootSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Nucor Corp. v. RhineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Grothaus v. Vista Health, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Emergency Ambulance Services v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cecil A. Osburn v. Pepsi Cola Metro Bottling Co.; Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America Insurance; And Death and Permanent Total Disability Trust FundCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  2. Tina L. Melius v. Chapel Ridge Nursing Center, LLC, and Amtrust North America InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  3. Clark v. Williamson G.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API