Bittle v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Yirden, Judge
| Appellant Helen Bittle appeals from the decision., of the Arkansas .Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission), affirming and adopting the, administrative law judge’s (ALJ) opinion, finding that Bit-tie did not prove that she sustained com! pensable injuries to her .upper and lower back, right hip, and coccyx on April 6 and 12,2015, arising out of and, in .the course of her employment with appellee Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Wal-Mart). Bittle argues that there is no substantial evidence to support - the Commission’s decision. 1 We .affirm.
| ¡.I Compensable Injury
“Compensable injury”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. Kellogg, Brown & RootSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Nucor Corp. v. RhineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Grothaus v. Vista Health, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Emergency Ambulance Services v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cecil A. Osburn v. Pepsi Cola Metro Bottling Co.; Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America Insurance; And Death and Permanent Total Disability Trust FundCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- Tina L. Melius v. Chapel Ridge Nursing Center, LLC, and Amtrust North America InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- Clark v. Williamson G.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018