Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Woodfield, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 8, 2009No. CA 08-846PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge.

| [David Pyle appeals from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of his claim for additional benefits. He argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision. We find no error and affirm.

Appellant, a truck driver, sustained admittedly compensable knee and back injuries when he fell off a flatbed trailer while pulling a tarp over his load on May 4, 2005. He was provided workers’ compensation benefits, including temporary-total disability and medical treatment. His treating physician, Dr. Jay Lipke, took MRI images of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Singleton v. City of Pine BluffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. K II Construction Co v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Roberts v. WhirlpoolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. LVL, Inc. v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Tempworks Management Services, Inc. v. Gary JaynesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Frost v. City of RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Lonoke Exceptional Sch., Inc. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Emergency Ambulance Services v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API