Belle Vista Investment Co. v. Hassen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After a judgment for money had been entered against appellant, an undertaking executed by two sureties was given for the purpose of staying execution of the judgment under Code of Civil Procedure, section 942. The sureties failed to qualify. This appellate court has discretion to issue a writ of supersedeas on condition that a proper undertaking be furnished. (Isaak v. Evidon, 197 Cal.App.2d 453 [17 Cal.Rptr. 339]; 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, p. 2214.)
The circumstances presented here indicate that respondent will suffer no prejudice if proper security is given. A writ of supersedeas…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isaak v. EvidonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967