Legal Opinion
Stennis v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 2006No. 25,549PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} This case presents us with procedural and substantive issues almost identical to those recently addressed by this Court in Smith v. City of Santa Fe, 2006-NMCA-048, 139 N.M. 410, 133 P.3d 866, cert. granted, 2006-NMCERT-004, 139 N.M. 429, 134 P.3d 120. For the reasons set forth in Smith, we affirm the district court’s determination that as a matter of law the City of Santa Fe (City) had the authority to prohibit Plaintiff from drilling a well that was previously approved by the Office of the State Engineer (OSE). We also consider an issue that was not raised in Smith and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- New Mexicans for Free Enterprise v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stennis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Stennis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Firstenberg v. MonribotNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Firstenberg v. MonribotNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Stennis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006