State Bank of Lansing v. McLaury
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County denying a motion to satisfy a judgment and to recall execution. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeals in two cases are here presented. The plaintiff is the same in both actions. C. S. McLaury and Harry Thompson are defendants in the one action, and Mc-Laury is the sole defendant in the other. Except for this circumstance, and a difference in the amounts involved in the two cases, the facts are identical, and the two appeals have been submitted upon a single set of briefs. A brief statement of the facts in No. 2334 will illustrate the legal questions common to the two appeals.
The plaintiff brought an action against McLaury on a promissory note, and recovered judgment by default. More…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Buckeye Refining Co. v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yanchor v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Malaquias v. NovoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Adjustment Corp. v. Hollywood Hardware & Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- E. A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. McCloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.