Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1886No. 11,445PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, J. —

Appellant brought this action to recover upon a promissory note executed by appellee. Two of the assigned errors are the overruling of appellant’s demurrer to the second and third paragraphs of appellee’s answer. Appellee embodied in and based the second paragraph of his answer upon the following written instrument, executed by appellant, viz.:

“January 13th, 1875.
“ I hereby release my claim for six hundred and thirty-seven and dollars, now in the hands of the assignee, against George Scott, bankrupt. E. H. Scott.”

The circumstances which led to the execution of this instrument,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Lash v. RendellIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. DerkesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Laboyteaux v. SwigartIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Shade v. CrevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Adams v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Colt v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Berryman v. DoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API