Legal Opinion
Harry L. Reynolds, Jr. v. International Amateur Athletic Federation, the Athletic Congress
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1994No. 93-3884PublishedCited by 241 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.
The International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) appeals the district court’s de nial of its motion to quash garnishment proceedings and vacate a default judgment and permanent injunction previously entered by the district court. As it did before the district court, the IAAF argues on appeal that the district court had neither subject matter jurisdiction nor personal jurisdiction over the IAAF in the proceedings resulting in the default judgment and permanent injunction.
I
A
Harry “Butch” Reynolds is a world-class sprinter who regularly participates in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by241 opinions
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Neogen Corporation v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Air Products & Controls, Inc. v. Safetech International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.