Legal Opinion

Shirek v. Roesink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 34,917Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant gave an agent of plaintiffs a verbal order for novelty clothing. The agent filled ouf order sheets identifying by numbers the kind of clothing so ordered and purporting to state the terms of sale. The order sheets were not signed by defendant but copies- thereof were given to him. Goods were shipped from time to time to defendant, some of which were accepted and paid for, and some in part rejected, returned to plaintiffs, and credit given defendant therefor. The last shipment, claimed to have been of special manufacture, was refused by defendant. Plaintiffs claim there was a valid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ericsson Manufacturing Co. v. Caille Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API