Legal Opinion
Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
This motion by plaintiff for production of documents under Rule 34, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., poses again the question of where the line should be drawn with respect to relevancy and to privilege—in this case arising out of attorney-client relationships and the alleged “work product” of attorneys.
The instant action is for treble damages under the anti-trust statutes by a single motion picture theatre against certain large film producers and distributors. Some of the defendants have interposed an affirmative defense that the action is barred by time limitation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bacon v. . FrisbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Gila Valley Irr. Dist. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- White v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Rintelen v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.