Legal Opinion

GALE A. ASKINS v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I AND SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 2018No. CV-17-259PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

|, Gale Askins appeals the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) denial of her claim that she sustained a compensable brain injury while working in a Kroger store. She argues that substantial evidence does-not support the Commission’s finding that her injury was the result of an idiopathic condition and not an .unexplained, compensable fall. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed, adopting the Commission’s opinion, and we granted Askins’s petition for review.1 We affirm.

12Askins contends that she sustained a compensable brain injury when she fell while working at Kroger in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Estridge v. Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Jivan v. Economy Inn & SuitesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brookshire Grocery Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Curtis v. LemnaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Clements v. Aramark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  4. GALE A. ASKINS v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I AND SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Kenneth Williams v. Malvern School District and Arkansas School Boards AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API