Vosburgh v. Lay
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Allegan. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
The plaintiffs were owners of the equity of redemption of certain premises on which the defendant fore*456closed a mortgage by proceedings under the statute. The mortgage provided that an attorney fee of $50 should be allowed in case of proceedings taken to foreclose.
The defendant bid in the premises and the attorney fee of $50 was included in the sum bid. The mortgage debt carriéd interest at ten per cent. The sheriff executed the deed,, and indorsed the time when it would become operative, .and on the last day of the time given for redeeming, the plaintiffs offered the defendant, for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Myer v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Parks v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Broadbent v. BrumbackIdaho Supreme Court · 1888
- Louder v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Damon v. DeevesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.