Legal Opinion

Ray v. First National Bank of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1960No. 6645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

The First National Bank of Arizona brought this action against James Ray to collect the balance due on a conditional sales contract. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment based on the pleadings and the defendant’s deposition. From an order granting the bank’s motion and judgment thereon defendant appeals.

The facts material to the disposition of this cause are established in the deposition of James Ray. While they are uncontradicted, the conclusions to be drawn therefrom are a source of dispute. Briefly, defendant purchased a Bearcat Forage Harvester from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowenberg v. BoothIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Marsh v. S. M. S. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Bank of America v. Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  5. National Bond & Investment Co. v. Union Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hewitt-Robins, Inc. v. Lea County Sand & Gravel, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Jarvis v. State Land Department, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jarvis v. State Land Department, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API