Legal Opinion

State v. Al-Sharif Scriven(075682)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 2016No. A-11-15PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In this appeal, we must determine whether a purported violation of the high-beam statute, N.J.S.A. 39:3-60, justified a police stop of a vehicle. The high-beam statute mandates that a driver dim a vehicle’s high beams when approaching “an oncoming vehicle.” Ibid.

Here, a police officer stopped a car traveling on a street with its high beams on, even though that car was not approaching an oncoming vehicle. At the time, the officer was on foot and his car was parked on a perpendicular street, where he was investigating an abandoned ear. After stopping the vehicle, the officer questioned…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. BooneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  2. State v. Mark Dunbar (077839) (Monmouth and StatewideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  3. State v. Amed Ingram (079079) (Camden and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. State v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. State v. SencionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API