Legal Opinion

Rother v. Interstate and Ocean Transport Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1982No. Civ. A. 77-2792PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

A. LIABILITY

1. On September 5, 1975, United States Steel Corporation (“USS”) employed Charles A. Rother (“Rother”) as a fuel utility man at its Fairless Hills works.

2. It was part of Rother’s job as a fuels utility man for him to meet barges discharging fuel oil at the pier and to connect the discharging hose from the barge to the intake valve on the USS pier.

3. Rother had performed the work of connecting fuel lines to discharge cargo for at least one year prior to the date of this accident.

4. USS was the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Prudential Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Keller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Brown v. Philippine President Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Kirsch v. Bangladesh Shipping Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Hall v. International Union Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API