Legal Opinion
Brown v. Philippine President Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-7325PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
Before the court are motions for summary judgment by defendants Philippine President Lines, Inc. (“Philippine”), Navios Corporation (“Navios”), and Navios Ship Agencies, Inc. (“Navios Ship”). For the reasons stated below, the motions are granted and judgment is entered in favor of all defendants.
I. FACTS
The material facts are not disputed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). On December 22, 1985 plaintiff William Brown (“plaintiff”) was employed by United States Steel (“USX”) as a welder. Plaintiff was directed to do welding repair work on the Philippine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mrs. Maria Toth Futo, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Intervenor-Appellant v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- William Derr v. Kawasaki Kisen K.K. Thomas Robertson v. Tokai Shosen K.KCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koernschild v. W.H. Streit, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Whitfield v. Craigwin Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Appeal of Brown (William J., Pamela)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Imre v. Peacock Maritime SADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016