Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Kane

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 13, 1975PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The defendants, Barry Kane and Higley Hill, Inc., appeal from a judgment of a Probate Court ordering them to pay $50,806, plus interest, to the plaintiff Goldman, as the executor of the estate of Lawrence E. Hill. We have before us the trial judge’s findings and rulings, along with various exhibits. The transcript of the evidence is not before us. A summary of the pertinent facts found by the judge follows.

Lawrence Hill, a fifty-three year old law school graduate, and his wife moved to Cape Cod in October, 1967. At that time Hill was the income beneficiary of two trusts. He received weekly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Hill v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Israel v. SommerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Allen v. MoushegianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Williams v. WaldmanNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Goldstone & Sudalter, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API