Matter of Frerichs
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This is an original disciplinary proceeding in which C. A. Frerichs, the respondent attorney, was cited to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him for conduct directed to the court.
The citation was immediately precipitated by respondent’s written assertion this court had practiced what amounted to deceit in processing a criminal appeal. Respondent was attorney for Michael P. Wetlaufer, defendant in State v. Wetlaufer, 236 N.W.2d 57 (Iowa 1975). In an unpublished per curiam opinion we affirmed Wetlaufer’s conviction of possession of a controlled…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. RonwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.