Legal Opinion
Yung v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1986No. 85-3301PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
In this diversity asbestos-related injury action, George Yung and his wife appeal the denial of a directed verdict and the denial of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In a trial solely on the issue of whether the statute of limitations barred the Yungs’ suit, the jury found that the action was barred and therefore the issues of liability and damages were not tried. The Yungs argue that the defendants did not produce sufficient evidence for the jury to consider and that the evidence was insufficient to form a basis for the jury’s verdict. In addition,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Bellamy v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Day v. NLO, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Yung v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.