Legal Opinion
Day v. NLO, INC.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 4, 1992No. C-1-90-67PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING THE MOTION - OF THE MOVING PLAINTIFFS FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT OR FOR A NEW TRIAL
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
Certain plaintiffs in this action (David Day, John Fitzgerald, Herbert Kelly, Hil-lery Webb, William Frey, Ralph Jones, and Julia Sansone 1 ) have moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict 2 or, in the alternative, for a new trial (doc. 255). The defendants oppose the motion (doc. 258), and the plaintiffs have responded (doc. 263). For the reasons set forth below, the moving plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bellamy v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Clarksville-Montgomery County School System v. United States Gypsum Company, National Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David Day John J. Fitzgerald Herbert L. Kelly William E. Frey Hillary Webb, Sr. Ralph Jones Julia Virginia Sansone v. Nlo, Inc. Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Taylor v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine & Furniture WorkersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- Taylor v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRONIC WORKERSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998