Legal Opinion
Veith v. Ogburn
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 16, 2006No. 101,824PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KEITH RAPP, Vice Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioners, Jimmy L. Veith, employer, and Compsource Oklahoma seek review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court which affirmed the trial court’s finding that Claimant sustained a compensable injury. The single issue on appeal is whether Claimant sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.
BACKGROUND FACTS
¶ 2 Claimant was employed by attorney, Jimmy Veith, as a legal assistant in his law office located in Ardmore, Oklahoma. On the morning of May 20, 2004, Claimant stepped…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Corbett v. Express PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Fudge v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- E. I. Dupont Denemours Co., Inc. v. ReddingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Holliman v. Twister Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Rural Waste Management & Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. MockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- CARNEY v. DIRECTV GROUP, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Triplett v. MYSTAF MEDICALCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- CARNEY v. DIRECTV GROUP, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.