Legal Opinion

Weigel v. Grossnickle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1954No. 226PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, J.

This appeal is from a refusal by the Common Pleas Court to grant a writ of habeas corpus.

The five Roark children were completely orphaned' by the death of their surviving parent, their mother, so that shortly thereafter, upon application and the choice of the two older sisters of Clara Slater as guardian, the Probate Court found it necessary to appoint a guardian and named appellant and Clara Slater, now Jordan, as coguardians. They accepted and qualified by giving bond. It is conceded that the court verbally instructed that Clara Slater actively administer the wards’ property and determine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Langan v. KessingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Ex Parte JustesOhio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Guardianship of ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. In re ForeOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Masitto v. MasittoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API