United States v. Davis
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members of three specifications of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928. He was acquitted of two specifications of rape and one specification of indecent assault, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934. Even though the appellant was acquitted of those latter offenses, the disposition of those charges is germane to our consideration of his assignment of error. The convening authority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. ChuculateUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. HenryUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- Pro Publica, Inc. v. ButlerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Pro Publica, Inc. v. Major General David J. Bligh; John Phelan; Earl G. Matthews; and Pete HegsethDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007