Chresfield v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARY, Senior District Judge.
The petitioner has filed a pro se “ ‘Motion For The Entry Of An Appropriate Order Which Will Permit An Out-Of-Time Appeal’ and ‘Motion For Appointment of Appellate Counsel For Indigent Defendant’ ” together with an “Amended Petition For Belated Appeal And Appointment Of Appellate Counsel, Or In The Alternative, Petition to Vacate Judgment Or Petition For Coram Nobis.”
He was convicted on two counts of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in 1961. He served the two, two year…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joel Smith v. The Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of the Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Korematsu v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Marsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976