Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Zimmerman

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided December 12, 1969No. 723918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBartunek, J.

This matter comes before the court npon an appeal from the decision of a referee apportioning a part of a landowner’s appropriation award to a bill-hoard advertising sign company, which had two billboards erected npon the otherwise vacant property that was taken.

The central question to be considered herein is to what extent can the billboard advertising sign company participate in the award as compensation for damages as the result of the termination of its leasehold interest?

Setting forth the relationship of the parties is a lease which was originally entered into on September 10, 1962, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. Trumbull Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Concrete Silo Co. v. WarstlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Exchange Leasing Corp. v. Finster N. Aegen, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Preston v. PecsokOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Lamar Corp. v. State Highway Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Arizona Outdoor Advertisers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Lamar Corp v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API