Legal Opinion
Miller v. McCarthy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1936No. 31,090PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial after a verdict for respondent.
Plaintiff, administrator of the estate of his son Marvin J. A. Miller, brought this action to recover upon a $5,000 life insurance policy issued ^to Marvin, conditioned to pay said sum to his wife, Florence V., upon proof of his death. The company which issued the policy answered admitting its liability, asked leave to pay the amount into court and have the representative of Florence Y. made a party defendant, and the company dismissed out of court. This was ordered as the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Young Women's Christian Home v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States Casualty Co. v. KacerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Fuller v. LinzeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- McGowin v. . MenkenNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Paden, Administrator v. BriscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. PalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- O'Hara v. CrawhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938