Legal Opinion
Moore v. Palen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1949No. Nos. 34,847, 34,848, 34,849, 34,850PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
Two actions were brought under our wrongful-death statute, M. S. A. 573.02, by the special administratrices of the estates of Frances Moore Anderson and Frederick William Anderson to recover damages for the death of Frances and Frederick from methyl chloride refrigerant gas. Defendants are the owner of the building occupied by the Anderson couple and the organization which services the refrigeration system in that building. The actions were tried together to one jury, which found a verdict of $7,010.15 in favor of plaintiff in each case. This included $510.15 for funeral…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Newell v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Young Women's Christian Home v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Foot v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Schwarz v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Russell v. HallettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Brundige v. AlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Rath v. Hamilton Standard Division of United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McCorkell v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.