Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Crawhall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1938No. 31,460Published

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff filed a claim in the probate court upon the following instrument alleged to have been executed by Rosa Heiden, deceased:

“Minneapolis Minn
“Aug 9th 1929
“I Rosa Heiden acknowledge that I owe my cousin Emma O’Hara the wife of Herbert O’Hara who lives at 5025 Lyndale Ave So Minneapolis Minn $3500.00 for nurseing and careing for me when I am sick Dureing my life and doeing my washing and sewing I agree to destroy the will that I now have and make a new will and leave Emma O’Hara $3500.00 If I die before I make my new will Emma O’Hara can have $3500.00 out of my estate.
“Mr…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Topinka v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Palmer v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bien v. UngerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  5. Errett v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API