Legal Opinion

Spound v. Action Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 9, 1974No. 73 C 1418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BAUER, District Judge.

This cause comes on the defendant’s motion to dismiss this action for lack of proper service and venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) and in the alternative to transfer this civil action to the Western District of Virginia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) or 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a).

This is an action based on the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 2,884,-992; 2,958,374; 2,982,340; and 3,024,-064 by the defendant.

The plaintiffs, Albert Spound and Joseph Spound, are residents of Massachusetts and plaintiff Morris Loeb is a resident of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barber-Greene Company v. Blaw-Knox Company and All Purpose Spreader CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  2. Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Ames Nowell v. Alexander C. DickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Jacques Arley and Charlotte Arley, Husband and Wife v. United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Burroughs Corp. v. Newark Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Magnavox Co. v. APF Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. Blumenthal v. Management Assistance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  3. Anchor Wall Systems, Inc. v. R & D Concrete Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Medicap Pharmacies, Inc. v. FaidleyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
  5. Emerson Electric Co. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API