Legal Opinion
Smith v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 30, 1995No. 1:93-cv-00143PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Exclude Anticipated Testimony, of James Gri-nolds. Ford filed the motion on January 24, 1995; plaintiffs responded on February 28, 1995; and Ford replied on March 10, 1995. The court held a Federal Rule of Evidence 104(a) hearing on March 17,1995, and thereafter took the matter under advisement. For the following reasons, Ford’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This product liability case arises out a vehicle fire involving a 1985 Ford F-150 Su-percab with dual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Billy D. Bammerlin v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Iacobelli Construction, Inc. v. County of Monroe, Rochester Pure Waters District, and Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lux v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Brooks Ex Rel. Brooks v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Jugle v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2006
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.