Witt v. Wonser
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries. It is for this purpose, and no other, that the action was brought. No judgment could be entered upon the court’s order, because it does not determine or fix any liability. The liability, if any, must .be determined or fixed by a court or a jury, and if it be found either by the court or the jury that the policy in question was a valid policy and in force at the time of the injury, then judgment follows in plaintiff’s favor in accordance with the order for judgment.
It requires no argument to conclude that, notwithstanding the finding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Puffer v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Puhr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Tellett v. AlbregtsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- James v. FishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Jones v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Waukesha Roxo Co. v. GehrzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Wendt v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.